I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Copyright © 1997-2026 by www.people.com.cn all rights reserved。关于这个话题，搜狗输入法2026提供了深入分析
。业内人士推荐Line官方版本下载作为进阶阅读
2026-02-27 00:00:00:03014253110http://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/pc/content/202602/27/content_30142531.htmlhttp://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/pad/content/202602/27/content_30142531.html11921 本版责编 苏显龙 赵晓曦 迟嘉瑞
他又打，一连打了五个，还是没人接。啤酒已经选好，他就扛在腰上，在客厅里来回踱步。他说，二十来分钟了，人家应该开饭了。现在去，是不是晚了？，推荐阅读搜狗输入法2026获取更多信息